Free Thought or Group Think
I just post this tidbit on the IMDB message board about my tepid lack of interest in Alexander Payne's Art House Wanna-Be "Sideways" --
"You don't get it do you? You like a movie because someone has put it into your head is a great movie, and you have unconditionally accepted it. Subconciously Kenneth Turan told you this is a great movie, you went to this it due to that, and you simply accepted that thesis lock, stock, and two smoking Madonna's Husbands..."
Okay, beating up on Guy Ritchie was a literary cheapshot. But this post to finally annoy the "Sideways" supporters got me thinking. Does anyone really have their own opinion?
I was unimpressed by "Sideways" as a film. While certainly in the minority of opinion I am certainly not alone in my opinion. Even among the critical elite you can find a bit of brave dissent on whether "Sideways" is all that. Witness this Salon Review.
But how much of my opinion regarding "Sideways" can reasonably called My Opinion. I read this review before seeing the film, along with reviews in L.A. Times and CNN.com. I generally put less weight on Salon's reviews. As much as I appreciate Salon's overall editorial outlook and literary style, I find their film reviews a bit too critical, a bit too snobby for my tastes.
So when I went in to see "Sideways" I wanted to like it. I really wanted to like it in much the same fashion I wanted to like"Mystic River" the year before. But in the end I just could not bring myself to like it.
I wonder though is that really my own opinion. Or is it a combination of other factors? My general dislike, or simple disregard of Payne's other work. My general attempt to stand back and not follow the pack. Even watching a friend break up with his girlfriend who work on "Sideways". Did all this other social white noise contribute to the eventual outcome of my artistic opinion?
Probably, it did.
That makes me think. How honest is anyone's opinion?
Can a film critic really put aside his life experience and the general weight of social opinion and judge anything on just its merits? What if a critic wishes to to appear like a "Thinking Man", a man of culture and taste, wqould he be more likely to join the pack and praise a film that in his heart of hearts really doesn't like just to fit in? And of course the opposite it is true as well.
Can opinion based truly on merit and nothing else? Can one person's opinion truly be seperated from their life's experience, and their need to fit in or not fit in with a group? Are we really thinking or are we just going along with what everyone else thinks.
Keep It Sexy, America.
"You don't get it do you? You like a movie because someone has put it into your head is a great movie, and you have unconditionally accepted it. Subconciously Kenneth Turan told you this is a great movie, you went to this it due to that, and you simply accepted that thesis lock, stock, and two smoking Madonna's Husbands..."
Okay, beating up on Guy Ritchie was a literary cheapshot. But this post to finally annoy the "Sideways" supporters got me thinking. Does anyone really have their own opinion?
I was unimpressed by "Sideways" as a film. While certainly in the minority of opinion I am certainly not alone in my opinion. Even among the critical elite you can find a bit of brave dissent on whether "Sideways" is all that. Witness this Salon Review.
But how much of my opinion regarding "Sideways" can reasonably called My Opinion. I read this review before seeing the film, along with reviews in L.A. Times and CNN.com. I generally put less weight on Salon's reviews. As much as I appreciate Salon's overall editorial outlook and literary style, I find their film reviews a bit too critical, a bit too snobby for my tastes.
So when I went in to see "Sideways" I wanted to like it. I really wanted to like it in much the same fashion I wanted to like"Mystic River" the year before. But in the end I just could not bring myself to like it.
I wonder though is that really my own opinion. Or is it a combination of other factors? My general dislike, or simple disregard of Payne's other work. My general attempt to stand back and not follow the pack. Even watching a friend break up with his girlfriend who work on "Sideways". Did all this other social white noise contribute to the eventual outcome of my artistic opinion?
Probably, it did.
That makes me think. How honest is anyone's opinion?
Can a film critic really put aside his life experience and the general weight of social opinion and judge anything on just its merits? What if a critic wishes to to appear like a "Thinking Man", a man of culture and taste, wqould he be more likely to join the pack and praise a film that in his heart of hearts really doesn't like just to fit in? And of course the opposite it is true as well.
Can opinion based truly on merit and nothing else? Can one person's opinion truly be seperated from their life's experience, and their need to fit in or not fit in with a group? Are we really thinking or are we just going along with what everyone else thinks.
Keep It Sexy, America.






